Nov 1 Fri
Can the doctrine of the Church of Christ develop?
Certainly, there has to be progress, even exceedingly great progress.
Will we be so full of hate for God, as to try to prevent it?
But it must truly be the development of the faith, not the alteration of the faith. Development means that each thing expands and continues being itself, while alteration means that a thing is changed into another.
The understanding, knowledge, and wisdom of individuals, as well as of the whole Church, should increase with the passing of the ages and the centuries. Still, only along its line of development, that is, keeping the same doctrine, the same meaning, and the same importance.
The growth of religion in the soul should be like the growth of the body. Though bodies grow and expand their parts with the passing of the years, they remain what they were. Much happens between the prime of childhood and the maturity of old age. But the old men of today who were the adolescents of yesterday are the very same people. Though the condition and appearance of an individual may change, he remains the same person.
The tiny members of children and the grown ones of young men are still the same members. Men have the same number of limbs as children. Whatever develops at a later age is already present in embryo; there is nothing new in old age that was not already latent in childhood.
There is no doubt, then, that the legitimate and correct rule of development, the established and wonderful order of growth, is this: in older people, the fullness of years always brings to completion those members and forms that the wisdom of the Creator created beforehand in their earlier years.
If, however, the human form were to turn into a different animal, or even if something were added to the number of its members or subtracted from it, the whole body would necessarily perish or become a monstrosity, or be in some way disabled. In the same way, the doctrine of the Christian religion should properly follow these laws of development, that is, by becoming consolidated in years, developed in the sequence of time, and more glorious as it advances in age.
In ancient times, our ancestors sowed the good seed in the harvest field of the Church. It would be very wrong and unfitting if we, their descendants, were to reap, not the genuine wheat of truth but the intrusive growth of error.
On the contrary, what is fitting is this: there should be no inconsistency between first and last, but we should reap true doctrine from the growth of true teaching, so that when, over time, those first sowings yield an increase, it may flourish and be tended in our day also.
It is right that those ancient dogmas of heavenly wisdom should over time be thoroughly cared for, filed, and polished; but it is sinful to change them, sinful to behead them or mutilate them.
They may take on more evidence, clarity, and distinctness, but they must retain their completeness, their integrity, and their characteristic properties.
By St Vincent of Lérins, a monk of the early Fifth century
Video